Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Strong Arguments for Rate Cut
- Inflation Concerns and Growth Expectations
- Growth Projection and Policy Rates
Introduction
During the recent Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting held from June 5–7, 2024, members Ashima Goyal and Jayant Varma put forth compelling reasons for a 25 basis point repo rate cut. They emphasized that the failure to implement the rate cut would have adverse effects on economic growth.
Strong Arguments for Rate Cut
The majority decision at the MPC meeting resulted in a 4-2 vote in favor of maintaining the policy repo rate at 6.50 per cent. However, both Goyal, Emeritus Professor at the Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research (IGIDR) in Mumbai, and Varma, a Professor at the Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, advocated for a reduction in the repo rate to 6.25 per cent.
Despite their support for a rate cut, the overall decision was to concentrate on gradually withdrawing accommodation to align inflation with the target while still supporting economic growth. Goyal and Varma also backed a change in stance to neutral.
Inflation Concerns and Growth Expectations
Goyal highlighted that the current inflation projection of 4.5 per cent for FY25 implies an elevated real repo rate of 2 per cent, which could hinder growth if the repo rate remains static. She warned against the negative implications of maintaining the status quo and stressed the need for timely adjustments to support growth.
Varma echoed Goyal’s sentiments, pointing out that prolonged adherence to a restrictive monetary policy would result in significant growth sacrifices in the upcoming years. He emphasized the importance of aligning policy rates with falling inflation levels to prevent economic slowdown.
Growth Projection and Policy Rates
Both experts raised concerns about the potential decline in growth rates for FY25 and FY26, underscoring the necessity for proactive measures to stimulate economic expansion. Varma emphasized the need for a balanced approach that considers both inflation targets and growth objectives.
Overall, the inputs from Goyal and Varma shed light on the importance of a nuanced approach to monetary policy decisions, especially in the current economic landscape.












![[object Object]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.msmestory.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fog-23.webp&w=3840&q=75)
![[object Object]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.msmestory.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fog-43.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
![[object Object]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.msmestory.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fog-9.png&w=3840&q=75)
![[object Object]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.msmestory.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fog-13.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
![[object Object]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcms.msmestory.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F08%2Fog-2.png&w=3840&q=75)



